There have been many positive results from reforms made to the design and operation of the 2014–20 European Structural and Investment (ESI) Funds, such as the introduction of the Common Provisions Regulation. Nevertheless coordination in implementation remains a challenge.
This is the conclusion of a study by Prognos and KPMG for the European Commission.
The study assessed the coherence, complementarity and coordination (3Cs) within the European Structural and Investment (ESI) Funds, and between these funds and other EU instruments, covering grants and financial instruments, under central and shared management.
Three major strategies were identified that could improve the operation of the 3Cs:
Furthermore, the report presents a set of key findings and options for consideration as part of the impact assessment for the post-2020 period.
The report is based on evidence from some 238 interviews, 32 focus group meetings, over 250 documents and two expert workshops.
The European Structural and Investment Funds contribute to strengthening the economic, social and territorial cohesion of the European Union and promoting growth and employment. They are supposed to make regions and cities more competitive, create new jobs and support sustainable development.
Autor: Dr. Jan-Philipp Kramer, Holger Bornemann, Moritz Schrapers, Mirjam Buck et al. (Prognos AG); Olaf Buske, Andras Kaszap et al. (KPMG), Paul Jeffrey and Jim Fitzpatrick (external experts)
Kunde: European Commission