Financing options
for Austria’s hydrogen
network

 

Client

Federal Ministry Republic of Austria for Climate Action, Environment, Energy, Mobility, Innovation and Technology

Year

2024

Partner

FINGREEN


Austria wants an initial hydrogen network by 2030. The question remains how the development of the necessary infrastructure can be financed. Austria’s Federal Ministry for Climate Action, Environment, Energy, Mobility, Innovation and Technology commissioned Prognos and FINGREEN with the task of analysing different potential financing models.

The total investment cost for the hydrogen network up to 2040 will amount to around 1.2 billion euros. This is based on Austria’s integrated network infrastructure plan and further studies with the majority of the investment being required in the period from 2027 until 2030. In a parallel phase, during the same period, the network infrastructure plan will see the conversion of two existing gas supply lines to hydrogen.

Initial hydrogen network by 2030

In the study, we examined numerous financing models, two of which emerged as particularly suitable: the high investment support with repayment mechanism model as well as the minimum quantity, or the minimum corridor model.

The selection took into account organisational elements with regard to the operationalisation of the model as well as financial elements, such as cost and risk distribution between the main actors, network operators, users and the state.

Model 1: High investment support with repayment

This variation of investment for the initial hydrogen network enables a repayment of the funding. The high level of funding reduces the initial risk for network operators. Equally, it is still possible for network operators to achieve absolute gains, should they repay the initial investment (pay-back regulation).

Strengths of the “High investment support with repayment” model:

  • This model can be implemented simply and fast.
  • Network operators have an incentive to pay back the investment – this increases their regulatory assets and thus their earning opportunities.
  • Risk distribution is balanced between network operators and the state.

Weaknesses of the “High investment support with repayment” model:

  • Until the funding is repaid the financing model is less attractive for network operators.
  • Should the hydrogen ramp-up fail, the large initial investment is not expected to be paid back at all or only to a small extent.
  • There is the danger that further investment will not be raised should the repayment promise a better return.

Model 2: Minimum quantity/quantity corridor

In this model, the state guarantees a minimum level of utilisation for a specific length of time. The difference between the actual ramp-up and the guaranteed amount will be balanced financially.

The strengths of the “Minimum quantity/quantity corridor” model are:

  • A balancing of the models is possible by varying how the investment is repaid.
  • If the ramp-up is successful, depending on the mode of repayment, the investment paid out can be reimbursed partially or in total.
  • The minimum quantity protects network operators from the consequences of a slow ramp-up.

The weaknesses of the “Minimum quantity/quantity corridor” model are:

  • Should there be no ramp-up the resulting costs for the state are high over the long term.
  • For this reason, a unilateral withdrawal mechanism is recommended for the state. Experts suggest a one-off payment with a 25 percent deductible for network operators.

The study considers both finance models to be feasible in Austria. The exact modalities should be further developed as part of a negotiation process.

Our approach

In the context of the investigation, we analysed models from across Europe (Germany, Netherlands, Belgium and France) as well as common financing models from other infrastructures.

Using research, interviews and workshops these financing options were narrowed down. The models that were considered advantageous were then then quantitatively analysed and qualitatively formulated using mathematical simulation. After further interviews and a final workshop, the investment funding and the minimum quantity were identified as the most promising models.

Links and downloads

Go to study (Website BMWET, in German)

Project team: Jens Hobohm, Sven Kreidelmeyer, Saskia Lengning, Ravi Srikandam

Latest update: 30.10.2024

Do you have questions?

Your contact at Prognos

Jens Hobohm

Partner, Director

View profile

More studies & projects on this topic

Energy prospects for Switzerland in 2060

ongoing
| Project

The Swiss Federal Office of Energy is planning to redesign its energy strategy for the period up to 2060. Under the leadership of Prognos, various scenarios are being developed for a secure and sustainable energy future for Switzerland. The focus is on the question of how rising electricity demand can be met in the future.

Efficiency of climate and energy subsidies in Austria

2025
| Project

The Republic of Austria promotes numerous energy efficiency measures. Prognos analysed these measures and drew up recommendations for further development.

Socially just transition to climate neutrality in the EU

ongoing
| Project

To facilitate the transition to a climate-neutral economy, Prognos is supporting the European Commission in implementing the European Fair Transition Observatory (EFTO).

Rail4Climate: Improving efficiency in the Austrian rail sector

ongoing
| Project

With Rail4Climate, the Climate and Energy Fund promotes capacity and efficiency improvements in the Austrian rail sector with a focus on digital operations control, data usage and automated maintenance. We support the project with an indicator-based evaluation system.

Carbon management study for the state of Brandenburg

2025
| Project

Prognos examined for the Ministry of Economic Affairs, Labor, Energy and Climate Protection of the State of Brandenburg what role CO2 capture, usage and storage could play in the state.

Sustainability management concept for municipal energy management

2025
| Project

Prognos and bridgingIT developed a concept for future internal sustainability management for a customer in the municipal energy sector.

International electricity price comparison

2025
| Project

Prognos compared international industrial electricity prices for the Austrian electricity industry. Based on this analysis, we also developed recommendations for government instruments to reduce electricity costs.

Design and implementation of the Resilience Expo

ongoing
| Project

Prognos is supporting the North Rhine-Westphalian Ministry of the Environment in organising, implementing and establishing the world's first trade exhibition for the climate adaptation industry.

Impact of extreme weather events on transport infrastructure

ongoing
| Project

Flooded streets, dried-up rivers, broken asphalt: we analyse the effects of extreme weather events on transport infrastructure and the economy.

Overall impact of climate change, mitigation and adaptation on the German economy

2025
| Project

In an expert report for the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs, we and GWS have for the first time estimated the economic impact of these three areas.

About us

We combine economic research and strategy consulting for sustainable decisions in politics, business and society. Our robust data, precise analyses and scientifically based findings enable fact-based progress – financially independent, politically neutral. 

Learn more